The 2004 ERS County Typology outlines economic dependence across U.S. counties, categorized by industries such as farming, mining, manufacturing, services, and government, with a focus on frontier counties.

The 2004 ERS County Typology outlines economic dependence across U.S. counties, categorized by industries such as farming, mining, manufacturing, services, and government, with a focus on frontier counties.
The 2004 ERS County Typology examines U.S. frontier counties experiencing housing stress and economic dependence on transfer payments. It highlights disparities in housing access and reliance on federal support
The 2004 ERS County Typology maps categorize U.S. counties by economic reliance on industries such as farming, mining, manufacturing, government, services, and non-specialized sectors, showing regional dependencies.
These maps compare frontier counties with superrural zip codes and highlight service-dependent areas based on ERS typology. They offer insights into geographic and economic distinctions within the U.S.
The 2000 Census map highlights U.S. frontier counties, defined by low population density and geographic isolation. This resource visualizes areas meeting the Frontier Education Center’s criteria for remoteness.
These maps highlight U.S. counties based on the 2000 Census, focusing on retirement destinations and areas with persistent poverty and high income inequality. The data underscores regional socioeconomic disparities.
This map illustrates U.S. frontier counties classified as mining-dependent based on ERS typology. It highlights regions where mining significantly contributes to economic activity and population distribution.
These maps illustrate persistent poverty in U.S. counties based on the 2004 ERS Typology, highlighting frontier and non-frontier regions where poverty rates have remained consistently high over time.
This map compares U.S. frontier counties from 1990 to 2000, illustrating regions designated as frontier in one or both years. It highlights shifts and consistencies in county classifications over the decade.
This map showcases U.S. frontier counties intersecting with federal lands, persistent poverty, and dependency on government or transfer income. It highlights overlapping challenges and economic reliance across these regions.
This map illustrates U.S. frontier counties with significant overlap between farming-dependent areas, federal lands, and Indian reservations. It provides insights into land use, economic reliance, and cultural intersections.
This map illustrates poverty levels in frontier counties, highlighting areas with persistent poverty, income inequality, and over 40% of residents living below 200% of the poverty line.
This map compares non-metro recreation counties with frontier counties, identifying areas engaged in recreation-related activities alongside rural frontier regions. Data highlights overlaps and distinctions.
This map identifies frontier counties classified as government-dependent, highlighting areas where federal, state, or local government employment significantly supports the local economy.
This map illustrates U.S. frontier counties reliant on government-related employment and services, emphasizing regions where public sector activity drives the local economy.
This map highlights U.S. frontier counties identified as retirement destinations, showcasing areas with a higher concentration of retirees and their impact on local demographics and services.
This map illustrates the distribution of U.S. frontier counties overlaid with federal lands, emphasizing areas where federally managed land plays a significant role in land use and resource management.
This map showcases U.S. frontier counties categorized as farming-dependent, highlighting areas where agriculture significantly contributes to the local economy and community livelihoods.
These maps highlight frontier areas across the U.S., focusing on population distribution, access to healthcare, and demographic factors like age, poverty, and ethnicity, emphasizing rural challenges and diversity.
Maps from 2000 highlight U.S. frontier counties, showing economic dependencies, federal land, and demographics. They reveal challenges and opportunities shaping these remote regions’ unique landscapes.
2010 map highlights Frontier Designated Areas overlapping with Native American, Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian lands, showcasing unique cultural and geographic intersections across the U.S.
2010 map shows U.S. frontier areas with a focus on population aged 17 or younger, highlighting regions where youth populations exceed or fall below the national average of 24%.”
2010 map illustrates U.S. frontier areas by population aged 65 or older, comparing regions with senior populations above or below the national average of 13%, emphasizing demographic disparities.
2010 map of U.S. frontier areas shows poverty levels, highlighting regions with rates above or below the national average of 15.3%, revealing significant economic disparities in rural communities.
2010 map of U.S. frontier areas highlights the percentage of non-white populations, comparing regions above and below the national average of 27.6%, showcasing racial diversity across rural communities.
2010 map of U.S. frontier areas shows the percentage of Hispanic populations by county, comparing regions above and below the national average of 16.3%, highlighting demographic distribution trends.
FAR ZIP Code Areas maps (2010) illustrate varying levels of remoteness from urban populations, offering insight into geographic isolation and accessibility challenges across the United States.
Frontier and Remote (FAR) ZIP Code Areas, 2019: These maps highlight rural ZIP code areas categorized by levels of remoteness from urban populations, offering insights into regional accessibility.
This 2014 map highlights ‘Super Rural’ areas designated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, showcasing regions with limited urban resource access and significant rural challenges.
Mapped in 2010, this visual highlights Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) in frontier areas, showing only 27% of CAHs located in these remote regions, emphasizing healthcare accessibility gaps.
Mapped in 2010, this map illustrates U.S. frontier counties based on the BPHC criterion, highlighting regions with population densities of 7 people or fewer per square mile in 48 states.
The 2004 ERS County Typology outlines economic dependence across U.S. counties, categorized by industries such as farming, mining, manufacturing, services, and government, with a focus on frontier counties.
The 2004 ERS County Typology examines U.S. frontier counties experiencing housing stress and economic dependence on transfer payments. It highlights disparities in housing access and reliance on federal support
The 2004 ERS County Typology maps categorize U.S. counties by economic reliance on industries such as farming, mining, manufacturing, government, services, and non-specialized sectors, showing regional dependencies.
These maps compare frontier counties with superrural zip codes and highlight service-dependent areas based on ERS typology. They offer insights into geographic and economic distinctions within the U.S.
The 2000 Census map highlights U.S. frontier counties, defined by low population density and geographic isolation. This resource visualizes areas meeting the Frontier Education Center’s criteria for remoteness.
These maps highlight U.S. counties based on the 2000 Census, focusing on retirement destinations and areas with persistent poverty and high income inequality. The data underscores regional socioeconomic disparities.
This map illustrates U.S. frontier counties classified as mining-dependent based on ERS typology. It highlights regions where mining significantly contributes to economic activity and population distribution.
These maps illustrate persistent poverty in U.S. counties based on the 2004 ERS Typology, highlighting frontier and non-frontier regions where poverty rates have remained consistently high over time.
This map compares U.S. frontier counties from 1990 to 2000, illustrating regions designated as frontier in one or both years. It highlights shifts and consistencies in county classifications over the decade.
This map showcases U.S. frontier counties intersecting with federal lands, persistent poverty, and dependency on government or transfer income. It highlights overlapping challenges and economic reliance across these regions.
This map illustrates U.S. frontier counties with significant overlap between farming-dependent areas, federal lands, and Indian reservations. It provides insights into land use, economic reliance, and cultural intersections.
This map illustrates poverty levels in frontier counties, highlighting areas with persistent poverty, income inequality, and over 40% of residents living below 200% of the poverty line.
This map compares non-metro recreation counties with frontier counties, identifying areas engaged in recreation-related activities alongside rural frontier regions. Data highlights overlaps and distinctions.
This map identifies frontier counties classified as government-dependent, highlighting areas where federal, state, or local government employment significantly supports the local economy.
This map illustrates U.S. frontier counties reliant on government-related employment and services, emphasizing regions where public sector activity drives the local economy.
This map highlights U.S. frontier counties identified as retirement destinations, showcasing areas with a higher concentration of retirees and their impact on local demographics and services.
This map illustrates the distribution of U.S. frontier counties overlaid with federal lands, emphasizing areas where federally managed land plays a significant role in land use and resource management.
This map showcases U.S. frontier counties categorized as farming-dependent, highlighting areas where agriculture significantly contributes to the local economy and community livelihoods.
These maps highlight frontier areas across the U.S., focusing on population distribution, access to healthcare, and demographic factors like age, poverty, and ethnicity, emphasizing rural challenges and diversity.
Maps from 2000 highlight U.S. frontier counties, showing economic dependencies, federal land, and demographics. They reveal challenges and opportunities shaping these remote regions’ unique landscapes.
2010 map highlights Frontier Designated Areas overlapping with Native American, Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian lands, showcasing unique cultural and geographic intersections across the U.S.
2010 map shows U.S. frontier areas with a focus on population aged 17 or younger, highlighting regions where youth populations exceed or fall below the national average of 24%.”
2010 map illustrates U.S. frontier areas by population aged 65 or older, comparing regions with senior populations above or below the national average of 13%, emphasizing demographic disparities.
2010 map of U.S. frontier areas shows poverty levels, highlighting regions with rates above or below the national average of 15.3%, revealing significant economic disparities in rural communities.
2010 map of U.S. frontier areas highlights the percentage of non-white populations, comparing regions above and below the national average of 27.6%, showcasing racial diversity across rural communities.
2010 map of U.S. frontier areas shows the percentage of Hispanic populations by county, comparing regions above and below the national average of 16.3%, highlighting demographic distribution trends.
FAR ZIP Code Areas maps (2010) illustrate varying levels of remoteness from urban populations, offering insight into geographic isolation and accessibility challenges across the United States.
Frontier and Remote (FAR) ZIP Code Areas, 2019: These maps highlight rural ZIP code areas categorized by levels of remoteness from urban populations, offering insights into regional accessibility.
This 2014 map highlights ‘Super Rural’ areas designated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, showcasing regions with limited urban resource access and significant rural challenges.
Mapped in 2010, this visual highlights Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) in frontier areas, showing only 27% of CAHs located in these remote regions, emphasizing healthcare accessibility gaps.
Mapped in 2010, this map illustrates U.S. frontier counties based on the BPHC criterion, highlighting regions with population densities of 7 people or fewer per square mile in 48 states.